Bleeding From Cut In The Mouth

ainamreG?

Germany instead?

22/02/2011: Background: German Foreign Office drops Linux

Apart by the fact that the German , which I respect a lot personally, are not so perfect, that the whole world over, there's always someone trying to protect the interests of part, that Microsoft is not that it is good to get them good shave painfully from Linux, that 's acquisition of Novell by Microsoft wanted something will be said and that certain developments were, unfortunately, budgeted, not just us Italians are good at tell balls, that this kind of choice will in the medium term many problems that will be subject to the Administration, there is a passage in the study by McKinsey quoted in the article on which I believe is good to dwell:

"Mainly Problems Were Identified in the Areas of interoperability, Particularly Affecting the sharing of office documents, in the concentration of important expertise in a small number of IT professionals, and in the low level of acceptance Among staff. "

Three concepts:
- interoperability problems, that is, dialogue between different systems, operational work, approach, effectiveness in the general representation of work and the mindset of those who work, and not only that, imo, the sharing of office documents.
With Linux it is indisputable that an application for an awareness of what you are doing much better than that required to operate a Windows system, and this requires greater accountability by the operator concerned, a factor, especially in PA any State, it is seen from this, at least in general, as a fake.
addition, the habit of using proprietary formats and often obsolete by the user, the inaction of officials in charge of the PA leadership, policy issues and the pressures of major polychrome prevent the widespread use of standardized formats, that would cut the head of the bull and require it to remain permanently in the open field of renewal.

- concentration of significant ability and experience in a limited number of IT professionals
If you want to be seen as "capable of ensuring the effectiveness of the system," p uo be strictly true in terms of statistics, especially when compared to that of MS professionals, but not that of the market potential, and undoubtedly much higher, since we are talking about training on open content and does not control or monitor.
course if it stops developing training cassano the evolutionary steps, that this is not good for the cause and the people's pockets.

- low level of acceptance by staff.
Linux is complicated, and this is still a widespread perception the absurd (and it also makes me pretty upset by that), but Let's take it as fact and facciamocene a reason.

Honestly, I have always considered these issues as part of minor, easily solved with time, but I must admit that often have significant weight, or even, in some cases this as probably decisive. The

is only one solution: formation of knowledge and awareness, anywhere, anytime.

Although Linux is already popular as long as there is not web-based OS, haranguing the crowd and spread the word, because it is equally important as the "enemy" never gives

and use the GUI!

There is still too many people panic when they see the shell, and these people should not be given any kind of alibi.